Skip to main content

Cracking the Code on Coding Productivity

CHICAGO – January 28, 2019 – With ICD-10-CM/PCS fully in place from the healthcare industry’s perspective, leaders in health information management (HIM) departments continue to assess its success and functionality. As the industry looks ahead to where coding productivity will go next, HIM leaders must measure its progress, as coding plays a huge role in controlling costs, structuring risk management, ensuring quality care, among other issues in the broader healthcare landscape.

Performance measurement, or benchmarking, is a key determinant of achieving optimal coding productivity and the focus of a newly published white paper from the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) entitled Measuring and Benchmarking Coding Productivity: A Decade of AHIMA Leadership. The white paper outlines AHIMA’s review of how coding has evolved, beginning with ICD-9-CM, the transition to ICD-10 and looking ahead to what the healthcare industry can expect next in coding and documentation.

“By leading the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10, AHIMA and our members saw the growing demand for high-quality data to support patient safety and reduce healthcare costs and continue to develop best practices to meet the demand,” said AHIMA CEO Wylecia Wiggs Harris, PhD, CAE. “Benchmarking where we’ve been against where we are now allows us to look at how coding affects the various sectors of the healthcare industry, and ultimately lets us pave the way for the future of coding productivity.”

Setting the Stage: ICD-9-CM

The white paper outlines a timeline of the implementation from ICD-9 to ICD-10, identifying that a key part of setting the stage for this transition was first evaluating the productivity of ICD-9 to create a benchmark for ICD-10. To do so, AHIMA established the following attributes to increase the likelihood of achieving optimal coding productivity:

  • High-quality, consistently available, high-speed and secure network access to needed data sources and repositories
  • Ease of access to data, as well as the availability of that data in a single source, i.e., the electronic health record (EHR), versus data that must be accessed from multiple sources
  • Data presented in a narrative structure versus documentation segregated by clinician or data type
  • Timely transcription of, completion of, and access to necessary documentation, written orders, results, and reports
  • Online/mobile access to relevant, timely coding materials; edit guidance; and access to an encoder coupled with reference material
  • Access to at least quarterly coding-oriented professional development

In 2007, AHIMA reflected upon these best practices to set benchmarks for coding productivity with ICD-9 in various settings, from inpatient facilities to emergency departments, as a means to measure the success of the upcoming ICD-10.

Coding’s present state: ICD-10-CM/PCS

Three years post implementation of ICD-10 HIM professionals were able to use the established benchmark practices to conduct studies of coding productivity thus far, including:

  • An ICD-10 study examining average inpatient coding times from more than 150,000 medical records in a five-month period beginning in October 2015, showing an initial dip in coding productivity immediately following the transition and increasing gradually in the weeks following.
  • A study evaluating more than 165,000 patient records beginning in March 2016 further noting an increase in coding productivity over a five-month span.
  • A survey to gather insights via phone from 156 HIM professionals, finding approximately74 percent indicated a change in productivity, 31 percent of which indicated an increase.

Using these results, AHIMA has provided multiple coding standard examples for ICD-10 in order to evaluate coding’s next phase.

Looking ahead: ICD-11

AHIMA continues to conduct research to address numerous points of coding productivity in various settings, such as outpatient, emergency room, home care, long-term/post-acute care and more. The organization will also look at characteristics of the coder such as education, experience, incentives and credentials, in order to ensure success for the HIM profession.

“With ICD-11 on the horizon, AHIMA is prepared to lead the way through ongoing research related to current and future versions of ICD and how they can help improve coding productivity, accuracy and quality,” Harris said. “In this way, accurately benchmarking coding productivity helps contribute to the long-term sustainability of the greater healthcare landscape.”


AHIMA is a global nonprofit association of health information (HI) professionals. AHIMA represents professionals who work with health data for more than one billion patient visits each year. AHIMA’s mission of empowering people to impact health drives our members and credentialed HI professionals to ensure that health information is accurate, complete, and available to patients and providers. Our leaders work at the intersection of healthcare, technology, and business, and are found in data integrity and information privacy job functions worldwide.

Looking to interview an AHIMA expert about this topic?

Contact Mike Bittner

Related Content

April 27, 2021

Success Requires a Shot of Emotional Intelligence

Many studies support that it is not skill or knowledge that separates effective from nominal performance. Instead, it is low emotional intelligence that separates the unsuccessful from the highly successful.

April 15, 2021

The Diversity of HIM Graduate Job Opportunities and the Skills Necessary for Post-Grad SuccessThe Importance of Showing Up

There are myriad departments and opportunities within hospitals for which the HIM skill set is well suited.


April 8, 2021

Education: Where Does It Get Us?

In today’s healthcare arena, the requirements for educated professionals have increased dramatically. But the field of health information management has not kept pace.

Back to top